Justin W. Anisman’s civil litigation practice at Brauti Thorning Zibarras LLP encompasses complex litigation files with an emphasis on commercial and contractual disputes and employment law matters for both employees and employers. He has extensive experience in the day to day handling of a large volume litigation practice and has represented clients before all levels of Ontario Courts, including the Superior Court of Justice, the Provincial Court of Justice and the Ontario Court of Appeal, as well as the Supreme Court of Canada.
Justin was called to the Bar of Ontario in 2014. He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada and the Advocates’ Society.
Justin is the founder of the Advocates for the Rule of Law. A legal think tank dedicated to promoting constitutionalism and the rule of law across Canada and abroad.
Hobbies and Interests
Justin enjoys spending time with his wife and two daughters. A former competitive swimmer and self-diagnosed smart phone addict, these days he is passionate about website design and development. Justin is proud to have hand designed and developed this very website. He has a weakness for Italian wine ever since honeymooning in Tuscany and is an avid reader of fiction, graphic novels and investment blogs.
Brauti Thorning Zibarras LLP
2018 to Present
Complex civil litigation practice with an emphasis on commercial and contractual disputes and employment matters for both employees and employers.
Mason Caplan Roti LLP
2014 to 2018
High-volume civil litigation practice with an emphasis on subrogated property claims, the defense of solicitors negligence claims, commercial and contractual disputes and employment matters for both employees and employers.
McCague Borlack LLP
Associate Lawyer / Student-at-Law
2012 to 2014
Day-to-day carriage of numerous litigation files in various areas of law, including: subrogation, commercial litigation, insurance defence, professional liability, accident benefits, personal injury, and employment law.
The University of Western Ontario
Juris Doctor, Faculty of Law
2010 to 2013
Dean’s Honours List
Margaret H. McNulty Award, for showing great promise.
On January 12, 2016, the Sheriff of the Regional Municipality of York sold the property located at 19 Church Avenue in the City of Toronto at auction for $1,050,000. It had been owned by Mr. Baradaran and/or his wife. The sale was made pursuant to an order that they satisfy costs awards made against them following the dismissals of an action they had filed and their appeal. Pursuant to the costs awards, the creditor, LawPRO, filed Writs of Seizure and Sale dated February 19, 2014, and February 24, 2014, with the Toronto and York Regional Sheriffs against various properties, including the Church Avenue property, and made a demand of payment by letter dated September 5, 2014. As the Baradarans had not responded or made payment by July 16, 2015, the creditor requisitioned the Enforcement Office of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto to begin sale proceedings in respect of the Church Avenue property.
Mr. and Mrs. Baradaran sought to set aside the sale and have the property returned to them arguing that the sale was improvident, that the required process was not followed, and that they were not given notice. Mr. Baradaran acknowledged that they had received notice of the sale on cross-examination during the hearing of the application. The application was dismissed. The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr. Baradaran’s application to adduce new evidence and his appeal.
Justin W. Anisman successfully acted for LawPRO through all level of the Court, including Superior Court of Justice, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court of Canada.
Allianze Power Corp v Pirouzi
Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Small Claims Court
Acting on behalf of the defendant by counterclaim’s subrogating insurance company, Justin Anisman sucesfully dismissed the Allianze’s counterclaim on summary judgment motion.
Represented successful vendor in claim for damages against defaulting purchasers of real commercial property. Purchasers walked away from transaction after changes to Toronto by-laws in week before closing and alleged that the vendor misrepresented the use for which the commercial property could be put.